Prompt Engineering is the essential skill for effective interaction with Large Language Models (LLMs). With the widespread adoption of ChatGPT, Claude, GPT-4, and other AI models, mastering prompt design has become a must-have capability for developers, product managers, and content creators. This guide systematically covers the core principles, mainstream techniques, and practical best practices of prompt engineering.

πŸ“‹ Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

  • Prompt Engineering: Designing optimized input text to guide LLMs in generating high-quality, accurate outputs
  • Zero-shot: Directly describe the task without providing examples
  • Few-shot: Provide a few examples to help the model understand task patterns
  • Chain-of-Thought: Guide the model through step-by-step reasoning for complex problems
  • ReAct: Combine reasoning with actions for tool usage and multi-step tasks
  • Structured Prompts: Build effective prompts using role, task, format, and constraint elements

Looking for quality AI prompt templates and tools? Check out our curated navigation resource:

πŸ‘‰ AI Prompt Directory - Discover the best prompt resources across the web

What is Prompt Engineering

Prompt engineering is the process of designing and optimizing input text (prompts) to guide large language models toward generating desired outputs. It's not just about "asking questions" β€” it's a practical art combining linguistics, cognitive science, and AI technology.

Why Prompt Engineering Matters

Dimension Poor Prompt Good Prompt
Accuracy Vague, off-topic Precise, on-point
Efficiency Requires multiple iterations Gets satisfactory results first try
Cost High token consumption Optimized token usage
Control Unstable output format Consistent, predictable format

Basic Components of a Prompt

code
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  Role Definition                     β”‚
β”‚  "You are a senior Python expert..." β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚  Task Description                    β”‚
β”‚  "Please optimize the following..." β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚  Context Information                 β”‚
β”‚  "This is an ETL script handling..." β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚  Output Format                       β”‚
β”‚  "Output in Markdown format with..." β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚  Constraints                         β”‚
β”‚  "Code must be compatible with..."   β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Core Prompting Techniques

Zero-shot Prompting

Zero-shot is the most basic prompting technique β€” directly describe the task without providing any examples. Suitable for simple, well-defined tasks.

Example:

code
Translate the following Chinese text to English:
"δΊΊε·₯ζ™Ίθƒ½ζ­£εœ¨ζ”Ήε˜δΈ–η•Œγ€‚"

Use Cases:

  • Simple classification tasks
  • Direct translation needs
  • Basic text generation

Pros: Simple and efficient, low token consumption Cons: Unstable results for complex tasks

Few-shot Prompting

Few-shot provides a small number of examples (typically 2-5) to help the model understand task patterns and expected output format.

Example:

code
Classify the sentiment based on the examples:

Example 1:
Text: "The service at this restaurant was amazing!"
Sentiment: Positive

Example 2:
Text: "Waited an hour for food, terrible experience."
Sentiment: Negative

Example 3:
Text: "Price is okay, taste is average."
Sentiment: Neutral

Now classify:
Text: "A bit pricey, but fresh ingredients and worth recommending!"
Sentiment:

Few-shot Best Practices:

Practice Description
Number of examples 3-5 is usually optimal; more increases cost
Example diversity Cover different types of input cases
Format consistency Keep all examples in the same format
Example order Place most relevant examples last

Chain-of-Thought (CoT)

Chain-of-Thought prompting guides the model to show its reasoning process, significantly improving performance on math, logic, and complex problems.

Basic CoT Example:

code
Question: A bookstore has 3 shelves, each shelf has 4 levels, 
and each level can hold 25 books. The store currently has 210 books. 
How many more books can it hold?

Let's think step by step:
1. First calculate total capacity: 3 shelves Γ— 4 levels Γ— 25 books = 300 books
2. Then calculate remaining space: 300 books - 210 books = 90 books

Answer: The store can hold 90 more books.

Zero-shot CoT (Magic Prompt):

Simply add "Let's think step by step" after the question to activate the model's reasoning ability:

code
Question: If a car travels at 60 km/h, how long will it take to travel 150 kilometers?

Let's think step by step:

ReAct Framework

ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) combines reasoning and action, enabling the model to use tools, search for information, and execute multi-step tasks.

ReAct Pattern:

code
Question: What's the weather like in New York today? Is it suitable for outdoor activities?

Thought: I need to look up today's weather information for New York.
Action: [Search] New York weather today
Observation: New York today is sunny, temperature 60-75Β°F, air quality good, AQI 45.

Thought: Based on the weather info, I need to assess outdoor activity suitability.
Action: [Analyze] Evaluate outdoor activity conditions
Observation: Sunny weather, moderate temperature, good air quality are all favorable conditions.

Thought: I can now provide a complete answer.
Final Answer: New York today is sunny with temperatures of 60-75Β°F and good air quality.
It's excellent for outdoor activities. Morning or late afternoon is recommended to avoid direct midday sun.

Self-Consistency

Self-consistency improves output reliability by sampling multiple times and selecting the most consistent answer.

python
responses = []
for i in range(5):
    response = llm.generate(prompt, temperature=0.7)
    responses.append(response)

final_answer = majority_vote(responses)

Structured Prompt Design

CRISPE Framework

Element Description Example
Capacity Role capability "You are a full-stack engineer with 10 years of experience"
Role Specific role "Acting as a code review expert"
Insight Background info "The project uses React+Node.js stack"
Statement Task statement "Review the following Pull Request code"
Personality Style requirements "In a professional but friendly tone"
Experiment Output format "List issues by severity level"

Complete Example:

code
## Role
You are a full-stack engineer with 10 years of experience, acting as a code review expert.

## Background
Our project uses React 18 + Node.js 20 stack, following Airbnb code standards.

## Task
Please review the following Pull Request code and identify potential issues.

## Requirements
- Use a professional but friendly tone
- Categorize issues by severity (High/Medium/Low)
- Provide specific modification suggestions

## Code
```javascript
// Code to review

Output Format

πŸ”΄ High Priority Issues

🟑 Medium Priority Issues

🟒 Low Priority Suggestions

code

### Negative Prompting

Explicitly telling the model "what NOT to do" effectively avoids common mistakes:

Write a technical blog post about machine learning.

Requirements:

  • Target audience: beginners
  • Include practical code examples
  • Length: approximately 1000 words

Please do NOT:

  • Use overly technical terms without explanation
  • Only discuss theory without examples
  • Use outdated library versions
code

## Scenario-Based Optimization

### Code Generation

Task

Implement a Python function to validate email address format.

Technical Requirements

  • Python 3.10+
  • Use regular expressions
  • Include type annotations
  • Add docstring

Test Cases

  • Valid: "user@example.com", "test.name@domain.co.uk"
  • Invalid: "invalid", "@nodomain.com", "spaces in@email.com"

Output

Only output the code, no explanation needed.

code

### Data Analysis

Role

You are a data analyst.

Data

Month Sales Users
Jan 50000 1200
Feb 48000 1150
Mar 62000 1400

Task

  1. Analyze sales trends
  2. Calculate average user contribution value
  3. Predict next month's sales

Output Format

Use Markdown tables and bullet points.

code

### Copywriting

Product

Smart Watch - FitPro X1

Target Audience

Urban professionals aged 25-35 who value health

Task

Write a social media promotional post

Requirements

  • Highlight health monitoring features
  • Casual and lively tone
  • Include call-to-action
  • Length: 50-80 words
  • Emojis allowed

Prohibited

  • Exaggerated claims
  • Absolute words like "best", "first"
code

## Practical Code Examples

### Python with OpenAI API

```python
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

def structured_prompt(role, task, context, format_spec):
    """Build a structured prompt"""
    prompt = f"""## Role
{role}

## Task
{task}

## Background
{context}

## Output Format
{format_spec}
"""
    return prompt

def generate_with_cot(question):
    """Generate response using Chain-of-Thought"""
    prompt = f"""{question}

Let's think step by step:"""
    
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4",
        messages=[
            {"role": "system", "content": "You are an assistant skilled in logical reasoning."},
            {"role": "user", "content": prompt}
        ],
        temperature=0.7
    )
    
    return response.choices[0].message.content

prompt = structured_prompt(
    role="Senior Python Developer",
    task="Optimize the following code for performance",
    context="This is a script processing CSV files, file size approximately 500MB",
    format_spec="Provide optimized code and performance comparison explanation"
)

print(prompt)

Few-shot Template Generator

python
def create_few_shot_prompt(task_description, examples, query):
    """Create a Few-shot prompt"""
    prompt = f"{task_description}\n\n"
    
    for i, (input_text, output_text) in enumerate(examples, 1):
        prompt += f"Example {i}:\nInput: {input_text}\nOutput: {output_text}\n\n"
    
    prompt += f"Now process:\nInput: {query}\nOutput:"
    
    return prompt

examples = [
    ("Apple", "Fruit"),
    ("Tomato", "Vegetable"),
    ("Salmon", "Seafood"),
]

prompt = create_few_shot_prompt(
    task_description="Classify the ingredient into the corresponding category (Fruit/Vegetable/Seafood/Meat)",
    examples=examples,
    query="Steak"
)

FAQ

1. Are longer prompts always better?

Not necessarily. Prompts should be detailed enough to clarify the task, but excessive length increases token costs and processing time. The key is precision, not verbosity. Start with concise prompts and optimize based on output quality.

2. How to handle model "hallucination" issues?

Several effective strategies:

  • Ask the model to cite sources
  • Use constraints like "If uncertain, please state so"
  • Provide reference materials as context
  • Use Self-Consistency for multiple validations

3. Where should Few-shot examples be placed in the prompt?

Research shows placing the most relevant examples last (closest to the actual question) works best. This is because LLMs have stronger attention to recent context.

4. Do different models need different prompts?

Yes, different models have different characteristics:

  • GPT-4: Strong comprehension, can handle complex prompts
  • Claude: Excels at long text, suitable for detailed instructions
  • Open-source models: May need more explicit, simpler instructions

5. How to evaluate prompt effectiveness?

Establish an evaluation framework:

  • Accuracy: Is the output correct?
  • Relevance: Is it on-topic?
  • Format: Does it meet requirements?
  • Consistency: Are results stable across multiple runs?

Summary and Resources

Prompt engineering is a skill that requires continuous practice and iteration. After mastering the core techniques, the key is ongoing optimization in real-world scenarios.

Key Techniques Review

Technique Use Case Complexity
Zero-shot Simple tasks ⭐
Few-shot Pattern learning ⭐⭐
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning problems ⭐⭐⭐
ReAct Tool calling ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Self-Consistency High reliability needs ⭐⭐⭐

Best Practices Checklist

βœ… Clearly define role and task
βœ… Provide sufficient context information
βœ… Specify expected output format
βœ… Use negative prompts to avoid common errors
βœ… Use Chain-of-Thought for complex tasks
βœ… Continuously test and iterate

Looking for more quality prompt templates, tools, and learning resources? We've curated the best AI prompt navigation for you:

πŸ‘‰ AI Prompt Directory - One-stop discovery of quality prompt resources

Here you can find:

  • πŸ“š Prompt template libraries
  • πŸ› οΈ Prompt optimization tools
  • πŸ“– Learning tutorials and guides
  • 🎯 Industry-specific prompts

πŸ’‘ Start Practicing: Visit the AI Prompt Directory to explore more prompt resources and begin your prompt engineering journey!